Master Seamless CE-SDS Method Transfer
Whitepaper
Published: July 25, 2025

Credit: Sciex
Capillary electrophoresis sodium dodecyl sulfate (CE-SDS) has become the gold standard for protein purity analysis throughout the biopharmaceutical lifecycle.
However, method transfer between capillary electrophoresis systems presents unique challenges including maintaining equivalent separation profiles, optimizing multi-capillary workflows and demonstrating regulatory-grade equivalency across different detection technologies.
This whitepaper presents validated bridging protocols and real-world case studies demonstrating successful method transfer strategies.
Download this whitepaper to learn about:
- Proven strategies for transferring high-resolution and high-speed CE-SDS methods between platforms
- Multi-capillary optimization techniques that increase throughput
- Real-world case studies showing equivalent purity analysis
Assessing method transfer
and equivalency between
the PA 800 Plus system and
the BioPhase 8800 system
2 | sciex.com/products/capillary-electrophoresis
Adopting a new analytical platform in the discovery, research,
development, or quality control environments of biopharmaceutical
development is a gradual process. This adoption requires thorough due
diligence, including a comprehensive investigation of the platform's
performance, reliability, and robustness. Equally important is assessing
how the new platform compares to existing instrumentation in terms
of data comparability and equivalency. These assessments are typically
evaluated in protocols such as method transfers or bridging studies.
An analytical method transfer is a protocol used to establish a
validated analytical test procedure in a new laboratory. The receiving
lab must demonstrate that they can reliably and accurately perform
the method, producing results equivalent to those in the original
laboratory. While using the same instrument simplifies the process,
it's not a requirement for a successful method transfer as the
primary objective is ensuring equivalent results, regardless of
the specific instrumentation used in the receiving laboratory.
Similarly, an analytical bridging study is a study designed to
compare the performance of 2 different analytical methods
or procedures, ensuring that they are comparable and can be
used interchangeably. This is crucial when switching from one
analytical method to another, for example, due to changes in
technology, instrument availability, or regulatory requirements.
To facilitate method transfer, bridging, and ultimately platform
adoption in biopharma, the BioPhase 8800 system was designed
to use the same reagent and capillary as the PA 800 Plus
system. This allows the user to achieve comparable results when
performing CE-SDS, cIEF, glycan heterogeneity, RNA or DNA
analyses. Each separation technique can use a designated kit to
maximize reproducibility and robustness on either platform.
The bridging studies discussed in this paper are centered around the
CE-SDS workflow. As CE-SDS is a widely used analytical technique for
protein purity analysis, applied throughout the biopharmaceutical life
cycle, it is an ideal technique to use as a case study to demonstrate
method transfer strategies and evaluate data comparability
between the PA 800 Plus system and BioPhase 8800 system.
Introduction
3 | sciex.com/products/capillary-electrophoresis
High resolution CE-SDS method transfer from the
PA 800 plus system to the BioPhase 8800 system
To successfully transfer the CE-SDS method
from PA 800 Plus system to the BioPhase 8800
system one must attain the same separation
profile, and migration time window for the peaks
of interest. Demonstrating this data equivalency
to current standard operating procedures (SOPs)
that utilize the PA 800 Plus system is critical in
order to gain acceptance for method transfer
by regulatory agencies or technology adoption.
Below we discuss some key considerations.
Addressing multiple capillaries
The BioPhase 8800 system enables 8 samples
to be run in parallel, significantly increasing
throughput and enabling faster turnaround
times for multiple assays. The BioPhase
cartridge is designed to accommodate 8
capillaries and the heat load generated during
separation. The cartridge is available fully
assembled, eliminating the need for assembly
by the end-user. The cartridge design efficiently
accommodates liquid cooling, operating
within a temperature range of 15 to 40o
C.
The innovative design of pre-assembled cartridge
features 8 cannula-electrodes. Each cannula
connects with the high-voltage power supply to
deliver voltage for separation. The cannula design
allows for concentric positioning of capillaries
on the inlet side, enabling efficient interaction
with the BioPhase 96 well plates. On the outlet
side of the cartridge, capillaries are bundled
together and exit parallel to the electrode. Inside
the cartridge body, the capillaries are immersed
in a liquid environment that effectively dissipates
joule heating. The cartridges are equipped with
a unique chip that tracks serial number, lot
number, total number of runs, date in service,
expiration date, manufacturing date, and capillary
dimensions. This feature facilitates the electronic
record-keeping of the cartridge’s usage history.
This increase in capillaries changes the
volume of reagents consumed during capillary
conditioning. And so, in transferring the CEFigure 1. Shows a comparison between the pre-injection capillary rinsing
steps between the BioPhase 8800 system and the PA 800 plus.
SDS method there is a need to optimize the
consumption of reagents during capillary
conditioning, separations and capillary shutdown
to achieve maximum throughput per sequence.
On the PA 800 Plus system the capillary
rinse steps consist of a long rinse with NaOH,
followed by HCl, water and finally the SDS
separation gel. These rinses are essential
to maintain run-to-run reproducibility,
consistency, and capillary longevity.
This same strategy is used on the BioPhase
8800 system. However, keeping the same NaOH
rinsing condition from the PA 800 plus system
on the BioPhase 8800 system would limit the
throughput because the system would run out
of NaOH before the conclusion of a sequence.
Therefore, by taking advantage of the flexibility
of the BioPhase 8800 system, the CE-SDS
separation method now performs 2 NaOH
rinses. The first rinse is performed at 80 psi to
push the viscous SDS gel out of the capillary
and the second rinse is performed at 20 psi
for silica surface treatment. (Figure 1) shows
a comparison between the pre-injection
capillary rinsing steps between the BioPhase
8800 system and the PA 800 plus system.
4 | sciex.com/products/capillary-electrophoresis
Evaluating rinsing procedure
To demonstrate the performance of the new
rinsing procedure, Figure 2 shows an overlay of
6 consecutive runs from the PA 800 plus system
(top) and BioPhase 8800 system (bottom). High
resolution separation of all sample components,
including the light chain, non-glycosylated heavy
chain and the heavy chain, were obtained.
The 10 kDa protein was added to all samples
as an internal standard and used for relative
migration time calculation. The average relative
migration time reproducibility of the BioPhase
8800 system for the heavy chain fragment
was RSD=1.1%, as depicted in Table 1.
The average corrected peak area% reproducibility
was RSD=0.85% for the non-glycosylated
heavy chain, the smallest peak in the separation
trace (Table 1). Please note that peak area
reproducibility is usually lower for smaller peaks.
Figure 2. Comparative chart
of 6 consecutive CE-SDS
separations of the reduced
IgG control standard sample
on the BioPhase 8800 system
and the PA 800 Plus system.
Table 1. Comparison of the
relative migration times of
the heavy chain (HC) peak in
the multi- and single capillary
electrophoresis instruments.
Left panel: lane to lane
(A-H) and run to run (1-16)
migration times obtained
by the BioPhase 8800
system. Right panel: run to
run (1-15) migration times
obtained by the PA 800 Plus
single capillary system.
The %RSD for the BioPhase
8800 system is 1.1% which
correlates well with the
0.83 %RSD obtained with
the PA 800 Plus system.
5 | sciex.com/products/capillary-electrophoresis
Instrument TCA* %LC %NG-HC %HC %Purity HC/LC Ratio
BioPhase 8800 system 15913.0 27.92 7.40 63.77 99.07 2.28
PA 800 Plus system 10957.0 31.16 7.07 60.96 99.19 1.96
Relative % difference 37% 11% 5% 5% 0.12% 15%
Addressing improvements in sensitivity
The BioPhase 8800 system is equipped with
both UV and LIF detection options. UV and LIF
detection systems are integrated and methoddriven, allowing users to take advantage of
both detection modes in the same sequence.
The BioPhase 8800 system UV detection is
equipped with 220 and 280 nm reflective
filters. The reflective filter coupled with modern
optics design allows for higher transmission
efficiency and shows as an increased peak height
compared to PA800 plus system (Figure 3).
Since heavy chain and light chain have slightly
different absorbance at different wavelengths,
we observed a shift in the HC/LC ratio while
maintaining the %purity for a molecule due
to the increased bandpass for the reflective
filter. (Table 2) The LIF detection maintained
high consistency between the 2 systems
with 488 nm laser excitation and very similar
detection technology. Multiple LIF detection
filter options are also offered and the switch
of LIF filter can be achieved within one
minute following front panel guided steps.
Figure 3.
The electropherograms of the
IgG control on the BioPhase
8800 system (pink) and the
PA800 Plus system (yellow).
*TCA= total time corrected
peak area of all integrated
peaks. The results shown here
for PA800 plus system are an
average of 3 injections and for
BioPhase 8800 system, there
is an average of 6 capillaries
X 3 injections = 18 data files
of the sample pooled sample
preparation. The remaining 2
capillaries were buffer blanks
with 10 kDa marker for baseline
monitoring.
Table 2.
Time-corrected peak area
of the main species in the
reduced IgG control sample
6 | sciex.com/products/capillary-electrophoresis
Figure 4. UV detection linearity, LOD and LOQ determination for the NIST
monoclonal antibody standard with the BioPhase 8800 system using
linear- linear (A) and log-log (C) interpretations. Panel B depicts the relevant
electropherogram sections with 300, 4.9 and 2.4 μg/mL sample injections.
Figure 5. LIF detection linearity, LOD and LOQ for the NIST monoclonal
antibody standard with the BioPhase 8800 system using linear-linear (A) and
log-log (C) interpretations. Panel B depicts the relevant electropherogram
sections from 38 μg/mL to 4 ng/mL sample injections.
The limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification
(LOQ) and linear range were first evaluated
with UV detection. A serial dilution of the NIST
monoclonal antibody standard was used for
this study, starting from a 5 mg/mL solution all
the way down to as low as 1.2 μg/mL. Figure 4
depicts the results showing excellent linearity for
both linear-linear (panel A, r2=0.999) and loglog (panel C, r2=0.997) plots, the latter for the
better visibility in the lower concentration range.
The LOD with the signal-to-noise ratio value of
S/N=3 was 2.4 μg/mL, while the LOQ with the
signal-to-noise ratio value of 10 was S/N=4.9 μg/
mL. As one can observe, the UV detection signal
response was linear over 4 orders of magnitude.
Panel B shows the relevant electropherogram
sections with 300, 4.9 and 2.4 μg/mL sample
injections. The detection linearity and limit
(LOD and LOQ) data were similar to what was
obtained earlier with the PA 800 Plus system.
The LOD, LOQ and detection range linearity
were also evaluated with the higher sensitivity
LIF detection. Similarly, a serial dilution of the
standard NIST monoclonal antibody was used.
However, in this instance, the range was from
38 μg/mL down to 4 ng/mL, considering the
significantly greater detection sensitivity of
the LIF system. Figure 5, shows the results with
optimal linearity for both the linear-linear (panel
A, r2=0.9999) and log-log (panel C, r2=0.9996)
plots over the nearly 4 orders of magnitude
concentration range. The LOD with the signalto-noise ratio of S/N=3 was 4 ng/mL, while the
LOQ with the S/N=8 was 10 ng/mL. Panel B,
shows the relevant electropherogram sections
from 38 μg/mL to 4 ng/mL concentration sample
injections, all in individual capillaries of the multicapillary system. This saved significant time as
the entire concentration range can be evaluated
in a single run. To increase the precision of the
approach, the variance between the capillaries
was normalized to the 10 kDa internal standard.
ICH Q3A provides recommendations to include
information regarding specified impurities in
certain new drug applications (NDAs), both for
identified and unidentified impurities in new
drug substance specifications. It also requires
acquiring and evaluating data that establishes
the biological safety of individual impurities, or
a given impurity profile, at the levels defined.
7 | sciex.com/products/capillary-electrophoresis
Figure 6. Impurity analysis down to 0.1% of the main product (0.1% of lysozyme spiked
into an IgG sample) with the BioPhase 8800 system. Conditions: -15kV with 1 minute
ramp time and with 20 psi applied at both inlet and outlet reservoirs during separation.
UV detection at 220 nm.
Figure 6, shows the analysis of 1000 mg/
ml USP mAb 003, monoclonal IgG1 spiked
with lysozyme at 100, 10 and 1 μg/ml levels,
demonstrating the capability of the BioPhase
8800 system multi-capillary electrophoresis
platform to readily detect the required
0.1% impurity level in the main product.
Regulators specify
0.1% impurity
level to the main
drug product.
8 | sciex.com/products/capillary-electrophoresis
Addressing regulatory compliance
on the BioPhase 8800 system
The Empower Chromatography Data System
is a chromatography data system (CDS)
widely used in the biopharmaceutical industry
and allows instrument control and data
processing from liquid chromatography, mass
spectrometry, capillary electrophoresis and
other analytical platforms. The BioPhase
8800 driver for Empower software minimizes
the need to train users on multiple software
platforms and ensures seamless workflow
transfer in a compliant and secure manner.
The BioPhase 8800 driver for Empower software
controls the system hardware and data collection,
allows for method and sequence editing and
stores multi-capillary data in the Empower
CDS with linked sample information. After data
acquisition, users can analyze the data directly in
Empower CDS and apply any necessary electronic
signatures on reports using sign-off capabilities.
Key features of the BioPhase 8800
driver for Empower software:
1. Seamless data acquisition: The driver
allows for direct control of the BioPhase
8800 system hardware, including method
and sequence editing capabilities
2. Data integrity: Direct transfer of data
acquired on the BioPhase 8800 system
with the ability to apply the 21 CFR
Part 11 toolset in the Empower CDS
to help satisfy GxP requirements
3. Streamlined data management: Facilitate
seamless data management from
analytical development to quality control
Workflow using the BioPhase 8800
driver for Empower software:
Create a CE method: There are 3 options to
create a CE method for the BioPhase 8800
system. Users can download pre-made
separation methods of interest from https://
www.SCIEX.com. Alternatively, users can
create or open a pre-loaded method using the
BioPhase 8800 driver for Empower software.
Finally, users can import a read-only copy
of the method of interest into Empower CDS
using the import function (Figure 7).
Create a sample set:
A sample set can be created directly in the
BioPhase 8800 driver for Empower software or
by using the sample set method editor. However,
the plate layouts and sample set method for
the BioPhase 8800 system must be defined
or validated in the embedded method editor
to avoid potential user errors (Figure X).
Figure 7. Embedded Empower CDS editor for method import (panel
A) and BioPhase 8800 driver for Empower software (panel B). Panel
A shows the method settings and Panel B the method time program.
9 | sciex.com/products/capillary-electrophoresis
Figure 8.
CE-SDS sample and reagent tray setup using
the sample set method editor in the BioPhase
8800 driver for Empower software.
Figure 9.
System status pane from the direct control screen
in the driver. The bar at the bottom (highlighted in
blue) shows the instrument status in real-time.
Prepare the BioPhase 8800 system:
The next step is to set up the BioPhase 8800
system with reagent and sample trays to run a
sequence. This task can be easily accomplished
using the direct control functions in the driver
(Figure 8). Manual operations are also available
in the driver, such as setting rinses, injections
and separations, changing wavelength settings,
modifying cartridge and sample compartment
temperature, and obtaining cartridge
information. Additionally, the system status
can be monitored in real-time (Figure 9).
Submit the sample set for separation:
The user can follow the functions in the
Empower CDS to select an existing sample
set method, as shown in Figure 10.
Monitor the separations via direct control:
The blue icon toward the bottom right of the direct
control screen (Figure 11) allows users to monitor
the separation status by opening the trace
view option. The trace view can simultaneously
display multiple electropherograms. The
user can toggle between the optical, current,
voltage and pressure traces. The user can also
select which capillaries are displayed using
the checkboxes at the bottom of the screen.
Figure X shows the live view of UV absorption
and current traces during a cIEF separation.
Figure 10.
Options available to load a sample set method.
10 | sciex.com/products/capillary-electrophoresis
Figure 11. Sample set display on the BioPhase 8800 driver for Empower software
showing the sample table and real-time separation profile with current trace.
Figure 12. Overlay of 8 representative CE-SDS runs of IgG control standard (SCIEX) under
non-reducing conditions. Peaks are labeled for the light chain (LC), heavy chain (HC),
heavy-light (HL) chains, heavy-heavy (HH) chains and heavy-heavy-light (HHL) chains.
Analyzing the data, reporting
and sign-off:
The BioPhase 8800 driver for Empower
software allows users to access the
resources currently available in the Empower
CDS, from data analysis to sign-off.
Multi-channel CE-SDS and cIEF assays using the
BioPhase 8800 driver for Empower software
Figure 13. Example of a report generated by the BioPhase
8800 driver for Empower software. This report is generated
using compliance features available in the Empower CDS.
11 | sciex.com/products/capillary-electrophoresis
The BioPhase 8800 system is a multi-capillary
system designed for high-throughput CE
analysis. It effectively meets the extensive
testing requirements of product and process
development, while maintaining the quality
of result and data comparability.
This paper discussed the considerations needed
to demonstrate data equivalency and perform a
bridging study between the BioPhase 8800 and the
PA 800 Plus systems using the CE-SDS assay.
The BioPhase 8800 system can consistently
provide precise and equivalent results to the
PA 800 Plus system for both high-resolution and
high-speed CE-SDS methods, providing a higher
throughput solution that operates within the
parameters of current SOPs, enabling a smooth
method transfer from early discovery to QC.
The BioPhase 8800
system can provide
a higher throughput
solution that operates
within the parameters
of current SOPs
Case studies
12 | sciex.com/products/capillary-electrophoresis
With the considerations of how improvements
in hardware features on the BioPhase 8800
system can impact data equivalency, the following
case studies discuss practical evaluations of
the BioPhase 8000 system to the PA 800 Plus
system and how to successfully transfer the
CE-SDS method between the 2 platforms.
13 | sciex.com/products/capillary-electrophoresis
High-speed CE-SDS method transfer
from the PA 800 Plus system to
the BioPhase 8800 system
The IgG HS separation method on the PA
800 Plus system was created to reduce the
total analysis time by 15 minutes, without
compromising data quality compared to
the IgG high-resolution (HR) method.
Unlike the PA 800 plus system the BioPhase
8800 system does not feature the CE-SDS
separation using the 10 cm commonly known
as the short side separation. The advantage of
using the short side is the significant decrease
in separation time. Even though the throughput
of BioPhase 8800 system is much higher,
the IgG high-speed (HS) method on the PA
800 plus system was validated and adopted
by many biopharmaceutical companies
To support the demand for even higher
throughput, the IgG HS method is successfully
transferred from the PA 800 plus system to the
8-capillary BioPhase 8800 system as shown in
Figure 14. The detailed evaluation is shown below:
Figure 14.
Separation of USP mAb 002 under reducing and non-reducing conditions on the
BioPhase 8000 system (left) and on PA 800 Plus system (right) using the HS CESDS method. Separation conditions are in the methods section. Migration time of
10 kDa marker on the BioPhase 8800 system using the HS CE-SDS method is within
1 min window compared to the migration time on the PA 800 Plus system.
Case study 1
14 | sciex.com/products/capillary-electrophoresis
Selecting 10 kDa as the internal
mobility marker and defining a
migration time window for 10 kDa
In CE, using an internal mobility marker
can be crucial. This is due to the consistent
relative position between the marker and the
sample peaks, which increases reproducibility
between different runs, capillaries,
chemistry lots, instruments, and users.
The first step in developing the method was to
set a migration time requirement. Although any
peak could be used as a marker, the migration
time for a mAb molecule peak under reduced
or non-reduced conditions can vary due to
differences in the antibody hydrodynamic size and
primary sequence. These differences can affect
the hydrophobicity of the mAb. Consequently,
using a mAb peak as a reference can impact
assay accuracy and reproducibility, as it may
change from molecule to molecule, making the
method non-viable as a platform method.¹
Figure 15 illustrates the difference between
the migration time of the monomer peak for
NISTmAb and SCIEX's IgG control standard mAbs.
Defining a migration time window for the 10
kDa internal marker is more reliable than
using a mAb peak, as this marker exhibits a
consistent migration pattern regardless of the
antibody sample and the sample preparation
conditions (reducing and non-reducing).
Figure 17 shows that the migration time of
the 10 kDa internal marker using the IgG HS
method was around 6.6 minutes on the PA 800
Plus system under reducing and non-reducing
conditions. Therefore, the 10 kDa molecule was
used as a marker to investigate other instrument
settings in this study, with a requirement for
the migration time set to 6.6 +/- 1 minute.
The migration time of the 10 kDa marker
on the BioPhase 8800 system using the HS
CE-SDS method was within a 1 min window
compared to the migration time on the
PA 800 Plus system, demonstrating data
comparability between the two systems.
Figure 15.
Migration time difference of 2 different mAbs under non-reducing
conditions. The top trace is from NISTmAb, and the bottom trace is from
the IgG control standard under non-reducing conditions using the IgG
standard method on the BioPhase 8800 system ( -15 kV/25oC).
Case study 1 continued
15 | sciex.com/products/capillary-electrophoresis
Investigating the separation
temperature and electric field strength
It is well known that 3 main factors can impact
the separation time: capillary length, electric field
strength (voltage), and separation temperature².
On the BioPhase 8800 system, the total
capillary length is fixed at 30 cm with 20 cm
of effective length. Thus, the electric field
and separation temperature are the only
variables that can be adjusted in a method.
Figure 16 shows the separation of
reduced USP mAb 002 under various
voltages and temperature conditions.
As expected, as the electric field strength and
temperature increased, peak migration time
decreased. However, as the peaks of interest
migrated faster, the baseline fluctuation from the
separation gel buffer became more significant and
could potentially interfere with peak integration.
The background signal from the separation
gel buffer was found to be influenced by
temperature and electric field strength.
Optimizing separation ramp time
Another method setting that is often overlooked
is the ramp time. Ramp time is the time it takes
the instrument’s high voltage power supply to
ramp from 0 kV to the set separation voltage.
The ramp time setting is crucial because it directly
impacts the reproducibility of the separation.
When voltage is applied, the electrode generates
a sudden heat wave that propagates to the
surrounding areas, affecting the capillary.3-4
The resulting temperature gradient may
induce dispersion and reduce separation
efficiency. However, theoretical models of the
thermal gradient, as explained by Guiochon
et al.,5 indicate that this effect is negligible
for capillaries with an inner diameter of
100 mm. The inner diameter of the capillary
used in this application was only 50 mm.
Figure 16. Overlay of the CE-SDS separation traces of USP mAb
002 at various separation voltages and temperatures.
Figure 17. Overlay of electropherograms obtained with NISTmAb and USP
mAb002 under non-reducing conditions using the IgG standard method
from PA 800 Plus system ( -30 kV/18oC).
Figure 16 shows that the baseline noise
was less significant at lower temperatures,
i.e., 18°C, even at higher electric fields.
Even though the baseline interference was
mitigated at 18°C, the migration time of the
10 kDa marker at the highest electric field (-30
kV) was 7.69 min, which falls outside the target
range of 6.5 +/- 1 min. Therefore, further method
optimization was carried out as described below.
Case study 1 continued
Upstream
process
optimization
Purification
development
Stability /
degradation
studies
~ 40,000 samples tested per
year for the development of
biotherapeutic molecules
Process Analytical
Sciences (PAS) -
Separations
Process
Development
Formulation /
Drug Product
Development
16 | sciex.com/products/capillary-electrophoresis
Increase throughput for the purity
analysis of biotherapeutic proteins
In the biotherapeutic life cycle, the process
analytical sciences (PAS) group at Johnson &
Johnson is at the beginning of the development
process of new biotherapeutics. This group
receives test samples from both upstream
and downstream API (active pharmaceutical
ingredient) development groups as well as the
formulations development group (Figure 18).
Per year, approximately 40,000 samples
come to PAS for various analyses. The
upstream samples come from process
optimization for cell growth, such as bioreactor
optimization. The downstream samples come
from protein purification development.
The drug product development group conducts
experiments and sends samples for buffer
formulation, stability, and degradation studies.
Figure 18. Diagram showing
the relationship between
process development in
upstream and downstream API
group, formulation and drug
product development group,
and the process analytical
sciences – separations group
Case study 2
17 | sciex.com/products/capillary-electrophoresis
Figure 19.
Purity percentage comparison assessment between PA 800 Plus system and the BioPhase 8800 system
of multiple molecule types under non-reduced (top) and reduced (bottom) conditions.
Evaluation of BioPhase 8800
system for early development
Four conditions were studied to assess the
performance equivalence between the BioPhase
8800 system and the PA 800 Plus system for
reduced and non-reduced CE-SDS samples:
• Comparison of purity assessment
across multiple modalities
• Reproducibility and consistency
assessment between the 8 capillaries
on the BioPhase 8800 cartridge
• Linear dynamic range across
multiple protein concentrations
• Comparison of purity assessment for
various process development samples
Percentage purity assessment
comparison across multiple modalities
A purified mAb molecule, bispecific, trispecific
and a vaccine product were separated using
the PA 800 Plus system and the BioPhase
8800 system for the purity assessment. On the
BioPhase 8800 system, 2 separation methods
were tested: the "traditional" and “lighting”
Pre-injection capillary conditioning steps:
Lightning
Total time: 10 minutes
Base: 80 PSI, 3 min
Acid: 50 PSI, 2 min
Water: 50 PSI, 1 min
Gel: 80 PSI, 4 min
Traditional
Total time: 25 minutes
Base: 80 PSI, 2 min
Base: 20 PSI, 5 min
Acid: 20 PSI, 5 min
Water: 20 PSI, 3 min
Gel: 80 PSI, 10 min
methods. The significant difference between
"traditional" and lightning CE-SDS methods is the
pre-injection capillary rinse steps (table below).
Figure 19 shows purity values across different
molecule types. The error bars on the PA 800 Plus
system represent the standard deviation of n=6
runs across multiple instruments and analyst
preparations. The error bars on the BioPhase 8000
system (BP) using traditional method represent
the standard deviation of n=6 within a single
sequence run. The error bars on the BP using
lightning method also represents the standard
deviation of n=6 within a single sequence run.
Case study 2 continued
18 | sciex.com/products/capillary-electrophoresis
Reproducibility and consistency
assessment between the 8 capillaries
on the BioPhase 8800 cartridge
A bispecific mAb sample was reduced
and separated using the BioPhase 8800
system. Figure 19 shows the intra-capillary
reproducibility of the 8 CE-SDS separations
obtained in capillaries A through H.
Table 3 reveals the consistency between
the capillaries in both total corrected
peak area and purity percentage.
Figure 20. Overlay of 8 CE-SDS separations of a bispecific mAb under
reducing conditions on the BioPhase 8800 system.
Capillary
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
Table 3. Percentage of purity and total corrected peak area
inter-capillary comparison on the BioPhase 8800 system.
% Purity
99.00
98.94
98.94
98.87
98.93
98.98
98.96
98.94
Total corrected area
70536
67061
65531
65024
65769
69608
70238
67397
Case study 2 continued
19 | sciex.com/products/capillary-electrophoresis
Linear dynamic range across multiple
proteins at different concentrations
on the BioPhase 8800 system
Three molecules were investigated, ranging
from 0.375 to 3 mg/mL, to determine the
linear response of the BioPhase 8800 system.
Figure 21 shows the response between
the total corrected peak area as a function
of final protein concentration injected in
the instrument. The R2 was > 0.99 for all 3
molecules, satisfying our requirements for linear
response in the desired concentration range.
Figure 22 shows the consistency in the
percentage purity obtained across the different
protein concentrations for all 3 proteins
demonstrating the consistency of the detector's
response on the BioPhase 8800 system.
Comparison of purity for various
process development samples
The process development sample type is the
most challenging sample type to determine the
equivalency between PA 800 Plus system and the
BioPhase 8800 system. Process development
samples vary significantly depending on the
excipients used, bioreactor conditions, and
purification or formulation conditions.
Figure 6 shows a graph where the left Y-axis is
the non-reduced percentage purity, and the right
Y-axis is the difference in percentage purity of
21 process development samples. The green
line shows the trend of the difference observed,
and the red line across all graphs represents the
passing threshold. The light blue bar is the data
obtained using the BioPhase 8800 system, and
the navy-blue bar is the PA 800 Plus system.
Most samples were observed to be within the
passing threshold margin set between the two
systems. However, samples 8 and 9 were deemed
outliers due to the level of degradation observed.
Based on the data shown in Figure 23
it was determined that the BioPhase
8800 system performance is equivalent
to the PA 800 Plus system.
Figure 21. Linear curve of
3 molecules with different
protein concentrations.
Figure 22. Consistency
of percentage purity
obtained for the 3 molecules
studied at 5 different
target concentrations.
Figure 23. Twenty-One (21) Process development sample comparison between PA
800 Plus system and the BioPhase 8800 systems. Light blue bars represent the
purity values observed using the BioPhase 8800 and the navy blue represents the
values obtained using the PA 800 Plus system.
Case study 2 continued
20 | sciex.com/products/capillary-electrophoresis
Direct comparison between
electrophoretic profiles
Figure 24 directly compares the PA 800 Plus
and BioPhase 8800 systems. The data is a
separation of a traditional mAb sample under
non-reduced conditions. The electropherogram
on the top shows the full view of the separation
and circled is the difference in peak height
between the IgG peaks on both platforms.
The peak height on the BioPhase 8800 system
is considerably higher compared to the PA 800
Plus system. The difference in peak height and
area is due to the innovative stray light control
engineered into the BioPhase 8800 system,
which increases the sensitivity of the system.
The zoomed-in view shows the overall peak
shape for the smaller peaks to be comparable.
Even though the total corrected area counts
differ, the relative percentage and peak shapes
are equivalent between the 2 instruments.
Similarly, Figure 25 shows the separation of
the same molecule under reduced conditions.
It is notable that the peaks are more intense
on the BioPhase 8800 system compared to
the PA 800 Plus system. Consequently, the
ratio between the heavy and light chains
differs between the 2 platforms, but the overall
purities remained comparable. Thus, the
results were determined to be equivalent.
Based on this extensive study, the BioPhase 8800
system was deemed a suitable alternative to PA
800 Plus system for early-phase CE-SDS testing.
To learn more about this case study
please view this webinar.
Figure 24. Direct comparison between PA 800 Plus and the BioPhase
8800 systems of a mAb sample under non-reduced conditions
Figure 25. Direct comparison between PA 800 Plus and the BioPhase
8800 systems of a mAb sample under reduced conditions
Case study 2 continued
References
1. Nunnally B. et al. A series of collaborations between various pharmaceutical companies and regulatory authorities concerning
the analysis of biomolecules using capillary electrophoresis. Chromatographia 2006 64:359 - 368.
2. Noblitt SD and Henry CS. Overcoming challenges in using microchip electrophoresis for extended monitoring applications;
Capillary electrophoresis and microchip capillary electrophoresis: principles, applications, and limitations. 2013
3. Palonen S et al. Effect of initial voltage ramp on separation efficiency in non-aqueous capillary electrophoresis
with ethanol as background electrolyte solvent. J. Chrom A 2005 1068 (1):107-114.
4. Xuan X et al. Joule heating effects on separation efficiency in capillary zone electrophoresis with an initial voltage ramp. Electrophoresis 2006 27: 3171–3180.
5. Dose EV and Guiochon G; Timescales of transient processes in capillary electrophoresis. J. Chrom. A 1993 652(1):263-275.
6. High-throughput charge heterogeneity analysis by capillary isoelectric focusing. SCIEX technical note, RUO-MKT-02-14297-B
Summary
The BioPhase 8800 system is a multi-capillary system designed for high-throughput
CE analysis. It effectively meets the extensive testing requirements of product and
process development, while maintaining quality of result and data equivalency.
This bridging study between the PA 800 Plus system and the BioPhase 8800 system
demonstrated that the BioPhase 8800 system can consistently provide precise
and equivalent results to PA 800 Plus system for both high-resolution and
high-speed CE-SDS methods.
Furthermore, the BioPhase 8800 system comes with a compliant software package,
enabling a smooth method transfer from early discoveries to QC labs.
The SCIEX clinical diagnostic portfolio is For In Vitro Diagnostic Use. Rx Only. Product(s) not available in all countries. For information on availability, please
contact your local sales representative or refer to www.sciex.com/diagnostics. All other products are For Research Use Only. Not for use in Diagnostic
Procedures. Trademarks and/or registered trademarks mentioned herein, including associated logos, are the property of AB Sciex Pte. Ltd. or their
respective owners in the United States and/or certain other countries (see www.sciex.com/trademarks). © 2025 DH Tech. Dev. Pte. Ltd. MKT-35149-A
Brought to you by

Download the Whitepaper for FREE Now!
Information you provide will be shared with the sponsors for this content. Technology Networks or its sponsors may contact you to offer you content or products based on your interest in this topic. You may opt-out at any time.
Experiencing issues viewing the form? Click here to access an alternate version